Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system

  • Munevera Hadžimešić Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Semir Imamović Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mirsad Hodžić Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  • Vasvija Uljić Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Dželil Korkut Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  • Fatima Iljazagić Halilović Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Lejla Selimović Čeke Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Aida Pojskić Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, University Clinical Centre Tuzla, Trnovac bb, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Keywords: Post anesthesia, recovery, propofol, sevoflurane, isoflurane

Abstract

Introduction: Postponed recuperation from anesthesia can lead to different complications such as apnoea, aspiration of gastric content whit consequent development of aspiration pneumonia, laryngospasm, bradycardia, and hypoxia. Aim of this research was to determine infl uence of propofol, sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia on post anesthesia recovery rate.
Methods: This was a prospective study; it included 90 patients hospitalized in period form October 2011 to may 2012 year, all patients included in the study underwent lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: group 1: propofol maintained anesthesia, group 2: sevoflurane and group 3: isofl urane maintained anesthesia. Assessments of recovery rate were done 1, 5 and 10 minutes post extubation using White fast tracking scoring system.
Results: Significant difference was observed only 1 minute after extubation (p=0,025) finding recovery rate to be superior in propofol group. Propofol group compared to inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane group, shows significantly faster recovery from anesthesia only one minute after extubation (p=0,046). In comparison of propofol group and isofl urane anesthesia group, statistical significance was noticed one minute following extubation (p=0,008). Comparison of propofol group and inhaled anesthesia groups recovery rates were not significantly different at all times measured. When we were comparing sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia, recovery rates shoved no signifi cant statistical difference.
Conclusions: Recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system was superior and with fewer complications in propofol maintained in comparison to sevoflurane and isoflurane maintained anesthesia only one minute post extubation, while after fifth and tenth minute difference was lost.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2013-12-15
How to Cite
Hadžimešić, M., Imamović, S., Hodžić, M., Uljić, V., Korkut, D., Iljazagić Halilović, F., Selimović Čeke, L., & Pojskić, A. (2013). Post anesthesia recovery rate evaluated by using White fast tracking scoring system. Journal of Health Sciences, 3(3), 190-195. https://doi.org/10.17532/jhsci.2013.106
Section
Research articles