Computed tomography simulator conversion curve dependence on scan parameters and phantom dimension

Authors

  • Goran Kolarevic Center for Radiation Therapy, International Medical Centers, Affidea, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Dražan Jaroš Center for Radiation Therapy, International Medical Centers, Affidea, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0722-8222
  • Bojan Pavičar Center for Radiation Therapy, International Medical Centers, Affidea, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-5797
  • Tatjana Ignjć Center for Radiation Therapy, International Medical Centers, Affidea, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6968-8726
  • Aleksandar Kostovski Center for Radiation Therapy, International Medical Centers, Affidea, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Goran Marosevic Center for Radiation Therapy, International Medical Centers, Affidea, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Branko Predojević Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-723X
  • Dragoljub Mirjanić Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17532/jhsci.2020.1085

Keywords:

Computed tomography simulator, computed tomography-relative electron density, heterogeneous phantom, Hounsfield units, relative electron density

Abstract

Introduction: Using computed tomography (CT) and treatment planning systems (TPS) in radiotherapy, due to the difference in photon beam energy on CT and linear accelerator, it is necessary to convert Hounsfield units (HU) to relative electron density (RED) values. The aim of this dosimetric study was to determine whether there is a significant effect of potential in the CT tube, field of view size (FOV), and phantom dimensions on the CT conversion curve CT-RED. The second aim is whether there are significant differences between the CT-RED obtained by the Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS) Thorax 002LFC phantom and the “reference” curve in the TPS, obtained by the CIRS 062M pelvis phantom, at the same CT conditions.
Methods: Heterogeneous CIRS 062M and CIRS Thorax 002LFC phantoms were used, which anatomically and dimensionally represent the human pelvis, head, and thorax, with a set of known RED inserts. They were scanned on a CT LightSpeed GE simulator and obtained CT-RED.
Results: The high voltage in the CT tube had a significant effect on the HU (t = 10.72, p < 0.001) for RED values >1.1, while FOV as a parameter did not show statistical significance for the 062M pelvis phantom. Comparing the slopes (062M pelvis and head) of the CT-RED for RED ≥ 1.1, the obtained value is t = 1.404 (p = 0.163). In the case of a 062M pelvis and a 002LFC phantom, we have seen a difference in RED values (for the same HU value) of 5 % in the RED region ≥ 1.1 (bone).
Conclusion: Patients should be imaged on a CT simulator only at the potential of the CT tube on which the conversion curve was recorded. The influence of the FOV and scanned phantom dimensions is not statistically significant on the appearance of the calibration curve (RED ≥ 1.1).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

30.12.2020

Issue

Section

Research articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Computed tomography simulator conversion curve dependence on scan parameters and phantom dimension. JHSCI [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];10(3):226-33. Available from: https://www.jhsci.ba/ojs/index.php/jhsci/article/view/1085

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.